| Exploitation 
                          of creative work can be a problem for any artist. For 
                          Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders the problem is 
                          often more complex as the symbols and motifs used in 
                          their designs also hold cultural significance for a 
                          particular group. Exploitation of the design impacts 
                          not only on the artist but also on the group. A 
                          positive example of the use of copyright law by an Aboriginal 
                          and Torres Strait Islander would be the use of Jimmy 
                          Pike's artwork by Rowe Fabrics, Sydney for an interior 
                          fabric. This was Pike's first licensing agreement in 
                          home furnishings. Jimmy 
                          Pike,   
                          
entered 
                            into a series of business arrangements with Culley 
                            and Wroth of Desert Designs. These would protect the 
                            integrity of his art (and separate the paintings and 
                            the production/marketing of limited edition prints) 
                            but enable additional income to be derived from the 
                            licensing of his designs and the strategic development 
                            of the Desert Designs company. (O'Ferrall, 1995: 3) Not 
                          all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have 
                          had such positive experiences.In 1994
  
                          
 
                            a case of theft of Aboriginal imagery occurred when 
                            a businessman 
had carpets made in Vietnam 
                            with images stolen from Aboriginal paintings, and 
                            falsely labelled them to give authenticity. The artists 
                            took him to court and won. He was ordered to pay compensation 
                            but went bankrupt.(The Koori Mail, 1998: 15) this became known as The 
                            carpet case.
  
                            Another significant case involving the infringement 
                            of the copyright of an Aboriginal artist has been 
                            resolved. The case, brought by the Sydney-based artist 
                            Bronwyn Bancroft with the assistance of the Aboriginal 
                            Arts Management Association, was listed for hearing 
                            in the Federal Court on December 12, 1991. The 
                            clothing manufacturer Dolina Fashion Group Pty Ltd 
                            supplied Grace Bros stores with an 'exclusive' dress 
                            design for a major promotion through its network. 
                            It was alleged that Dolina's stylists had requested 
                            an Aboriginal look from the Japanese fabric 
                            maker Sastani to present as the front line of their 
                            fashion range. The 
                            fabric maker supplied a print in three colour ways, 
                            which, it was alleged, was a direct copy of an original 
                            artwork by Bancroft, Eternal Eclipse (1998), 
                            which had been reproduced in Jennifer Isaac's book 
                            Aboriginality: Contemporary Aboriginal Paintings 
                            and Prints. The 
                            clothing manufacturer and retailers claimed that they 
                            were innocent of the infringement and the fault lay 
                            with the fabric maker who printed the design. The 
                            case raised a number of interesting issues in copyright, 
                            especially in relation to Aboriginal art. Copyright 
                            law, in its present form, functions best to protect 
                            the individual artist from the unauthorised use of 
                            his or her work. For artists to have their work pirated 
                            represents a theft of their intellectual property 
                            and a distortion of the intent of the artwork. Although, 
                            in Bancroft's case, it may be difficult to prove who 
                            was directly responsible for appropriating the image, 
                            the design used by Dolina is a copy of Bancroft's 
                            painting. The artist has suffered the shock and embarrassment 
                            of seeing her original artwork trivialised. Bancroft 
                            also has an established reputation as a fashion designer 
                            of original garments, at a different level of the 
                            fashion market from Dolina's styles for major retail 
                            outlets. (Cochrane Simons, 1991)
 
                           
                            | The 
                                Label of AuthenticityBronwyn Bancroft's case is one of the cases that 
                                motivated the development of the Label of Authenticity. 
                                The National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association 
                                (NIAAA)
  
                                
through 
                                  funding from the Australia Council and ATSIC, 
                                  are in the process of developing a national 
                                  system of labelling that will distinguish art 
                                  and cultural products from the fake products. 
                                  As a certified trade mark the Label of Authenticity 
                                  will be attached to a product or used in relation 
                                  to a service originating from an Aboriginal 
                                  or Torres Strait Islander person. (NIAAA)  
                                  Why do we need a Label of AuthenticityFor some time concern has been growing that 
                                  Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander designs 
                                  and symbols have been incorrectly used, most 
                                  often without permission. Examples include artwork, 
                                  tourist souvenirs and carpets, to name a few.
 The 
                                  primary responsibilities of the NIAAA as the 
                                  national peak Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 
                                  arts and cultural service include the continued 
                                  and increased recognition and protection of 
                                  the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 
                                  artists. NIAAA provides culturally appropriate 
                                  advice, information, referrals and support services 
                                  to indigenous artists and organisations. (NIAAA, 
                                  1999) |  Label of Authenticity. Courtesy: 
                              National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association (NIAAA)
 |  
 
                           
                            |  NIAAA logo. Courtesy: National 
                                Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association (NIAAA)
 |  Copyright 
                          guidelinesThe following questions developed by the NIAAA are suggested 
                          as a guide to artists when they are asked about using 
                          their work.
 Copyright 
                          detectivesTo see just how extensive the problem of Aboriginal 
                          art exploitation is, you can explore a CD-ROM, The 
                          House of Aboriginality. The aim of the CD-ROM is 
                          to get people to look at Aboriginal designs more closely, 
                          and ask are they authentic or imitations?
 The 
                          CD-ROM features: 
                          an 
                            image banka 
                            media file of news clippingsFederal 
                            Court judgementsvideo 
                            clips of Aboriginal artists. (The Koori Mail, 1998: 3)
 House 
                          of Aboriginality CD-ROM (Mac and PC) A$55.00 (plus 
                          $7.95 postage and handling within Australia). The House 
                          of Aboriginality project team has also produced a Copyright 
                          Detective's Kit. For A$75.00 (plus $7.95 postage and 
                          handling within Australia) you will receive The House 
                          of Aboriginality CD-ROM, 60 page full colour Copyrites 
                          national touring exhibition catalogue, and official 
                          House of Aboriginality Training Manual. Ideal 
                          educational aid for all levels, from primary to tertiary, 
                          leading students into the world of Aboriginal art via 
                          the issues of copyright infringement and cultural integrity. 
                          CD-ROM and Copyright Detective's Kit available from: 
                          http://www.mq.edu.au/house_of_aboriginality/cdrom.htm More 
                          on ownership and copyrightFor further information on ownership and copyright check:
 VideoCopyrites, an SBS documentary on the issue of 
                          copyright and Aboriginal motifs. Product code: SBCOP. 
                          Available for $80.00 from Marcom Projects. Phone (07) 
                          3801 5600 Fax (07) 3801 5622. Email: marcom@marcom.com.au
 ArticlesAdams, Phillip, Shame 
                          of the White Man
 Sugden, 
                          P. (2001) Ownership: Style and the Law, Textile Fibre 
                          Forum, No 62, p. 49.Sugden, P. (2001) Plagiarism techniques and processes, 
                          Textile Fibre Forum, No 61.
 Sugden, P. (1996) Trade marks and textiles, What's in 
                          a mark?, Textile Fibre Forum, No 47.
 To 
                          find out more about Textile Fibre Forum visit: www.ggcreations.com.au/tafta/. 
 |